Our Gold Guy
No Result
View All Result
Saturday, April 1, 2023
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Contact Us
Our Gold Guy
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Our Gold Guy
No Result
View All Result
Home Economy

The FTC Shouldn’t Be a Lawless Agency

by Kirk Arner and Harold Furchtgott-Roth
August 1, 2021
in Economy, Politics
The FTC Shouldn't Be a Lawless Agency

The Federal Trade Commission has been on the march.  Over the past month, the Commission has held two “open” meetings, rescinded two major bipartisan agreements by party-line vote, and positioned itself to write regulations for the first time in decades.

In the words of a former commissioner, the current FTC is “Icarus flying without the constraints of history, economics, or law.”  He predicts that its “regulatory overreach…will end with the FTC’s wings melting in the courts.”

Yet one of the most consequential expansions of Commission authority has flown largely under the radar.

Section 5 of the FTC Act tasks the Commission with preventing “unfair or deceptive acts or practices.”  What exactly is an unfair or deceptive act or practice?  The answer has, perhaps purposely, evaded the FTC and courts for decades.  Wielding Section 5 authority, the FTC has targeted all manner of industries, including health supplements, shoemakers, and even social media influencers.  Recently, the Commission rescinded a bipartisan policy statement on this issue, giving American businesses even less notice as to what conduct might be considered a violation.

A central principle of American jurisprudence is that defendants are not presumed liable until a court of law determines otherwise.  Correspondingly, defendants cannot be compelled to pay claimed damages until a court first finds liability.

IRA BERSHATSKY LOVES AMERICA – Most precious metals companies are run by wokesters. Ira’s is not. He is unabashedly AMERICA FIRST and can help you move wealth or retirement to physical precious metals with a gold or silver IRA, or just get metals discreetly shipped to your door. Contact him now.

In the Alice-in-Wonderland world of FTC investigations, legal principles were sometimes turned on their head.  “Damages” were seized by the FTC long before the defendant had its day in court, and long before any finding of liability for Section 5 violations, thanks to a peculiar interpretation of another section of the FTC Act: Section 13(b).

Section 13(b), by its text, authorizes the FTC to seek temporary and permanent injunctive relief in federal court for Section 5 violations.  Section 13(b) does not and has never mentioned anything about monetary damages.  Yet for decades, courts looked beyond the text of the statute and held that Section 13(b) inherently empowered the FTC to seek monetary damages.

Under this extraordinary interpretation, the Commission could and did go directly to federal court and request monetary damages from accused parties.  Accused parties never had the opportunity to present a defense.  Sometimes the damages sought by the FTC were in excess of the total assets a defendant had, leaving it with scant resources to mount a legal defense.

Defendants in FTC investigations faced a Hobson’s choice: negotiate a settlement with the FTC and face financial ruin; or fight the FTC in court and, even if damages were never awarded, face  financial ruin.

Such was the case with Vylah Tec, a Florida start-up accused of selling “unneeded” services to its customers.  Without any prior notice or administrative proceeding, the FTC sued the company for millions of dollars, alleging Section 5 violations.  Prior to trial, a federal court granted the FTC’s request for a preliminary injunction, freezing the assets of both the company and the owners personally, as well as transferring over $670,000 in assets into a receivership account.  After the trial concluded, the court denied the FTC’s request for monetary damages.  Yet after receivership and attorneys’ fees, only $34,500 was returned to the company.

Fortunately for the rule of law, these FTC abuses were recently curtailed.  Earlier this year, the Supreme Court struck down the prior, atextual interpretation of Section 13(b).  In doing so, it affirmed that “permanent injunction” does not mean “monetary damages,” and that, as currently written, Section 13(b) of the FTC Act does not empower the Commission to seek monetary damages for Section 5 violations.

In the wake of this decision, many criticized the Court, claiming it “ruled in favor of scam artists” and that the decision will “turn[] the agency into a paper tiger.”

But as the Court observed in its opinion, the FTC already has a better arsenal of administrative powers to protect consumers and seek consumer redress.  Section 19 of the FTC Act already empowers the FTC to seek monetary damages for Section 5 claims.  Section 19 focuses on actual harm, applying only when a reasonable person would have known under the circumstances that the conduct at issue was dishonest or fraudulent.  Section 19 requires the FTC to provide actual notice to prospective defendants of their alleged illegal conduct via an administrative proceeding and issuance of a “cease and desist” order before seeking monetary damages in federal court.  And perhaps most importantly, before the court may award damages, Section 19 requires the FTC to prove the defendant is liable in court.

FTC administrative hearings allow parties wrongly or mistakenly accused of wrongdoing to present exculpatory evidence.  They’re a vital element of the rule of law that affords important notice and due process protections to American businesses trying to navigate the often-Kafkaesque modern administrative state.  Even if the administrative hearing should reach an adverse decision, parties can appeal to a court of law.

Unfortunately, Congress may give the FTC the power to seek damages without any due process.  The House recently passed H.R. 2668.  The authors of this bill seek to reimplement the prior Section 13(b) regime by explicitly empowering the FTC to seek monetary damages under this section once more.

Our Gold Guy America First

But at its core, this proposed Section 13(b) still lacks the vital requirement of proving liability in court over the defense of accused parties before seeking damages.  The proposed 13(b) also has none of the procedural safeguards of Section 19.

In lesser countries, government agencies seize property, destroy businesses, and disrupt lives without due process of law, but instead with the consent of a judiciary unwilling to check administrative excesses.  America should not be one of those lesser countries; the FTC should not be one of those lawless agencies; and our judiciary should not be put in a position of awarding damages without first demanding proof of liability over the defense of accused parties.

Photo by ipse dixit on Unsplash. Article by Kirk Arner & Harold Furchtgott-Roth cross-posted from Real Clear Markets.

The Biden Regime and Globalists Don’t Want You Owning Precious Metals

Look around. Things aren’t the way they should be. Between Pandemic Panic Theater, Ukraine, food shortages, and a push for Central Bank Digital Currencies, everything you’ve spent your life building and protecting is in jeopardy.

Precious metals are historically the most reliable and safest hedge against economic turmoil. With the Biden regime and globalists enhancing the chaos, it’s important for patriotic Americans to take control of their financial future.

Ira Bershatsky offers consultations to those who want to invest in precious metals. During these consultations, he will match your current financial situation with the best physical precious metal purchases whether you want to rollover your IRA or have coins discreetly shipped to your home. You will not talk to a telemarketer or sales rep. You will talk to a true expert in precious metals with decades of experience helping people protect and advance their wealth.

Fill out the form here and we will schedule a precious metals consultation with Our Gold Guy, Ira.

Schedule a Precious Metals Consultation Today:

Tags: EconomyFederal Trade CommissionFTCReal Clear MarketsTop Story


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Bypass Big Tech Censors



Our Gold Guy



MyPatriotSupply


Doomsday

Moody’s Chief Economist Warns “Things Are Going to Start to Break” Across the Financial System

March 31, 2023
Silicon Valley Bank (1)

Here’s Why SVB Was a Big Warning Sign, Not an Isolated Event

March 31, 2023
Peter Schiff Says the Current Financial Crisis is Going to Get Worse Than 2008 (VIDEO)

Peter Schiff Says the Current Financial Crisis is Going to Get Worse Than 2008 (VIDEO)

March 31, 2023

Recent News

Doomsday

Moody’s Chief Economist Warns “Things Are Going to Start to Break” Across the Financial System

March 31, 2023

Search

No Result
View All Result

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Finance
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Politics

About Our Gold Guy

This site is dedicated to helping Americans learn more about the economy, business, and politics. Our nation is in turmoil on all three fronts. We want to make a difference.

© 2021 NOQ Report

No Result
View All Result
  • Contact Us
  • Finance
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Contact Us

© 2021 NOQ Report

Session expired

Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.

>